| |
|
Papers On Argumentative / Pro-Con Essays
Page 11 of 224
|
|
Censoring the Internet
[ send me this paper ]
A 5 page argument against censoring the Internet. The main focus of the paper deals with the issue of pornography on the Internet since this is the subject with the most attention and conflict. Pornography is a freedom of speech and while we do not want our children to watch, or see, it, this does not mean we should restrict others. Adults should be responsible for what the children have access to and as such this should be the primary method of censorship. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: Nonet.wps
Constitutional Protection
[ send me this paper ]
In June of 1990, Russell and Laura Jones of St. Paul, Minnesota found a cross burning in their yard. Two adolescents were charged; one plead guilty, the other was found guilty of a St. Paul 'hate speech' ordinance which specifically makes bias-motivated cross burning a crime. The case was eventually appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme court. This 5 page paper describes the themes and findings, the controversial issues and different perspectives of that case as an example of the argument that the Constitution does not protect the average American from harm. The bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: Protecon.wps
Beyond the Burning Cross
[ send me this paper ]
In June of 1990, Russell and Laura Jones of St. Paul, Minnesota found a cross burning in their yard. Two adolescents were charged; one plead guilty, the other was found guilty of a St. Paul 'hate speech' ordinance which specifically makes bias-motivated cross burning a crime. The case was eventually appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme court. This 6 page paper describes the themes and findings, the controversial issues and different perspectives of the case as presented by Edward J. Cleary in the book, Beyond the Burning Cross. No additional sources cited.
Filename: Burncros.wps
Should Hate be a Crime ?
[ send me this paper ]
A 9 page argumentative essay pertaining to 'hate crimes' and whether or not enhanced criminal penalties should exist for those who commit them. Used as a constant reference is the relevant Supreme Court Case of R.A.V. vs. St. Paul and various tenets of the First Amendment. The writer concludes that free speech must be protected at virtually any cost in the U.S. even if it means that hate speech and 'hate crimes' will continue to cost lives.
Filename: Hatecrim.wps
 Not
sure which paper(s) to order?
Email usfor
FREE, one page excerpts
from any file above!
Remember!
If you can't find what you need,
we also do CUSTOM researchas well!!!
*Our research papers are created
to be used as models to assist you in the preparation of your own
term paper. Neither 1MillionPapers.Com nor any website owned by
The Paper Store Enterprises Inc., will EVERsell a research
paper to ANYstudent giving us ANYreason to believe
that (s)he will submit our work , either in whole or part, for academic
credit at any institution in their own name. !!!Plagiarism is a
CRIME! IF YOU QUOTE FROM OUR WORK, YOU MUST CITE OUR PAPER
AS ONE OF YOUR SOURCES. The Paper Store does not engage nor participate
in any transactions for the purpose of assisting students in committing
academic fraud. This service is NOT available to anyone who does
not have a valid, ethical reason for seeking our tutorial assistance.
The organization's rights to research, write, and globally-publish
exemplary papers on the Internet are protected, Free Speech and
shall continue unabated and uncensored....
|
|
